Kelistrikan dan Kemagnetan

**Topics covered:**

Currents

Resistivity

Ohm's Law

**Instructor/speaker:** Prof. Walter Lewin

## Free Downloads

### Video

- iTunes U (MP4 - 103MB)
- Internet Archive (MP4 - 202MB)

» Download this transcript (PDF)

When positive charges move in this direction, then per definition, we say the current goes in this direction.

When negative charges go in this direction, we also say the current goes in that direction, that's just our convention.

If I apply a potential difference over a conductor, then I'm going to create an electric field in that conductor.

And the electrons -- there are free electrons in a conductor -- they can move, but the ions cannot move, because they are frozen into the solid, into the crystal.

And so when a current flows in a conductor, it's always the electrons that are responsible for the current.

The electrons fuel the electric fields, and then the electrons try to make the electric field 0, but they can't succeed, because we keep the potential difference over the conductor.

Often, there is a linear relationship between current and the potential, in which case, we talk about Ohm's Law.

Now, I will try to derive Ohm's Law in a very crude way, a poor man's version, and not really 100 percent kosher, it requires quantum mechanics, which is beyond the course -- beyond this course -- but I will do a job that still gives us some interesting insight into Ohm's Law.

If I start off with a conductor, for instance, copper, at room temperature, 300 degrees Kelvin, the free electrons in copper have a speed, an average speed of about a million meters per second.

So this is the average speed of those free electrons, about a million meters per second.

This in all directions.

It's a chaotic motion.

It's a thermal motion, it's due to the temperature.

The time between collisions -- time between the collisions -- and this is a collision of the free electron with the atoms -- is approximately -- I call it tau -- is about 3 times 10 to the -14 seconds.

No surprise, because the speed is enormously high.

And the number of free electrons in copper per cubic meter, I call that number N, is about 10 to the 29.

There's about one free electron for every atom.

So we get twen- 10 to the 29 free electrons per cubic meter.

So now imagine that I apply a potential difference -- piece of copper -- or any conductor, for that matter -- then the electrons will experience a force which is the charge of the electron, that's my little e times the electric field that I'm creating, because I apply a potential difference.

I realize that the force and the electric field are in opposite directions for electrons, but that's a detail, I'm interested in the magnitudes only.

And so now these electrons will experience an acceleration, which is the force divided by the mass of the electron, and so they will pick up, a speed, between these collisions, which we call the drift velocity, which is A times tau, it's just 8.01.

And so A equals F divided by Me.

F is e E, so we get e times E divided by the mass of the electrons, times tau.

And that is the the drift velocity.

When the electric field goes up, the drift velocity goes up, so the electrons move faster in the direction opposite to the current.

If the time between collisions gets larger, they -- the acceleration lasts longer, so also, they pick up a larger speed, so that's intuitively pleasing.

If we take a specific case, and I take, for instance, copper, and I apply over the -- over a wire -- let's say the wire has a length of 10 meters -- I apply a potential difference I call delta V, but I could have said just V -- I apply there a potential difference of 10 volts, then the electric field -- inside the conductor, now -- is about 1 volt per meter.

And so I can calculate, now, for that specific case, I can calculate what the drift velocity would be.

So the drift velocity of those free electrons would be the charge of the electron, which is 1.6 times 10 to the -19 Coulombs.

The E field is 1, so I can forget about that.

Tau is 3 times 10 to the -14, as long as I'm room temperature, and the mass of the electron is about 10 to the -30 kilograms.

And so, if I didn't slip up, I found that this is 5 times 10 to the -3 meters per second, which is half a centimeter per second.

So imagine, due to the thermal motion, these free electrons move with a million meters per second.

But due to this electric field, they only advance along the wire slowly, like a snail, with a speed on average of half a centimeter per second.

And that goes very much against your and my own intuition, but this is the way it is.

I mean, a turtle would go faster than these electrons.

To go along a 10-meter wire would take half hour.

Something that you never thought of.

That it would take a half hour for these electrons to go along the wire if you apply potential difference of 10 volts, copper 10 meters long.

Now, I want to massage this further, and see whether we can somehow squeeze out Ohm's Law, which is the linear relation between the potential and the current.

So let me start off with a wire which has a cross-section A, and it has a length L, and I put a potential difference over the wire, plus here, and minus there, potential V, so I would get a current in this direction, that's our definition of current, going from plus to minus.

The electrons, of course, are moving in this direction, with the drift velocity.

And so the electric field in here, which is in this direction, that electric field is approximately V divided by L, potential difference divided by distance.

In 1 second, these free electrons will move from left to right over a distance Vd meters.

So if I make any cross-section through this wire, anywhere, I can calculate how many electrons pass through that cross-section in 1 second.

In 1 second, the volume that passes through here, the volume is Vd times A but the number of free electrons per cubic meter is called N, so this is now the number of free electrons that passes, per second, through any cross-section.

And each electron has a charge E, and so this is the current that will flow.

The current, of course, is in this direction, but that's a detail.

If I now substitute the drift velocity, which we have here, I substitute that in there, but then I find that the current -- I get a e squared, the charge squared, I get N, I get tau, I get downstairs, the mass of the electron, and then I get A times the electric field E.

Because I have here, is electric field E.

When you look at this here, that really depends only on the properties of my substance, for a given temperature.

And we give that a name.

We call this sigma, which is called conductivity.

Conductivity.

If I calculate, for copper, the conductivity, at room temperature, that's very easy, because I've given you what N is, on the blackboard there, 10 to the 29, you know what tau is at room temperature, 3 times 10 to the -14, so for copper, at room temperature, you will find about 10 to the 8.

You will see more values for sigma later on during this course.

This is in SI units.

I can massage this a little further, because E is V divided by L, and so I can write now that the current is that sigma times A times V divided by L.

I can write it down a little bit differently, I can say V, therefore, equals L divided by sigma A, times I.

And now, you're staring at Ohm's Law, whether you like it or not, because this is what we call the resistance, capital R.

We often write down rho for 1 over sigma, and rho is called the resistivity.

So either one will do.

So you can also write down -- you can write down V equals I R, and this R, then, is either L divided by sigma A, or L times rho -- let me make it a nicer rho -- divided by A.

That's the same thing.

The units for resistance R is volts per ampere, but we call that ohm.

And so the unit for R is ohm.

And so if you want to know what the unit for rho and sigma is, that follows immediately from the equations.

The unit for rho is then ohm-meters.

So we have derived the resistance here in terms of the dimensions -- namely, the length and the cross-section -- but also in terms of the physics on an atomic scale, which, all by itself, is interesting.

If you look at the resistance, you see it is proportional with the length of your wire through which you drive a current.

Think of this as water trying to go through a pipe.

If you make the pipe longer, the resistance goes up, so that's very intuitively pleasing.

Notice that you have A downstairs.

That means if the pipe is wider, larger cross-section, it's also easier for the current to flow, it's easier for the water to flow.

So that's also quite pleasing.

Ohm's Law, also, often holds for insulators, which are not conductors, even though I have derived it here for conductors, which have these free electrons.

And so now, I want to make a comparison between very good conductors, and very good insulators.

So I'll start off with a -- a chunk of material , cross-sectional area A -- let's take it 1 millimeter by 1 millimeter -- so A is 10 to the -6 square meters.

So here I have a chunk of material, and the length of that material, L, is 1 meter.

Put a potential difference over there, plus here, and minus here.

Current will start to flow in this direction, electrons will flow in this direction.

The question now is, what is the resistance of this chunk of material?

Well, very easy.

You take these equations, you know L and A, so if I tell you what sigma is, then you can immediately calculate what the resistance is.

So let's take, first, a good conductor.

Silver and gold and copper are very good conductors.

They would have values for sigma, 10 to the 8, we just calculated for copper, you've seen in front of your own eyes.

So that means rho would be 10 to the minus 8, it's 1 over sigma.

And so in this particular case, since A is 10 to the -6 the resistance R is simply 10 to the 6th times rho.

Because L is 1 meter.

So it's very easy -- resistance here, R, is 10 to the -2 ohms.

1/100 of an ohm.

For this material if it were copper.

Let's now take a very good insulator.

Glass is an example.

Quartz, porcelain, very good insulators.

Now, sigma, the conductivity, is extremely low.

They vary somewhere from 10 to the -12 through 10 to the -16.

So rho, now, the resistivity, is something like 10 to the 12 to 12 to the +16, and if I take 10 to the 14, just I grab -- I have to grab a number -- then you'll find that R, now, is 10 to the 20 ohms.

A 1 with 20 zeros.

That's an enormous resistance.

So you see the difference -- 22 orders of magnitude difference between a good conductor and a good insulator.

And if I make this potential difference over the wire, if I make that 1 volt, and if I apply Ohm's Law, V equals I R, then I can also calculate the current that is going to flow.

If I R is 1, then the current here is 100 amperes, and the current here is 10 to the -20 amperes, an insignificant current, 10 to the -20 amperes.

I first want to demonstrate to you that Ohm's Law sometimes holds, I will do a demonstration, whereby you have a voltage supply -- put a V in here -- and we change the voltage in a matter of a few seconds from 0 to 4 volts.

This is the plus side, this is the minus side, I have connected it here to a resistor which is 50 ohms -- we use this symbol for a resistor -- and here is a current meter.

And the current meter has negligible resistance, so you can ignore that.

And I'm going to show you on an oscilloscope -- we've never discussed an oscilloscope, but maybe we will in the future -- I'm going to show you, they are projected -- the voltage is go from 0 to 4, versus the current.

And so it will start here, and by the time we reach 4 volts, then we would have reached a current of 4 divided by 50, according to Ohm's Law, I will write down just 4 divided by 50 amperes, which is 0.08 amperes.

And if Ohm's Law holds, then you would find a straight line.

That's the whole idea about Ohm's Law, that the potential difference, linearly proportional to the current.

You double the potential difference, your current doubles.

So let's do that, let's take a look at that, you're going to see that there -- and I have to change my lights so that you get a good shot at it -- oh, it's already going.

So you see, horizontally, we have the current, and vertically, we have the voltage.

And so it takes about a second to go from 0 to 4 -- so this goes from 0 to 4 volts -- and you'll see that the current is beautifully linear.

Yes, I'm blocking it -- oh, no, it's my reflection, that's interesting.

Ohm's Law doesn't allow for that.

So you see how beautifully linear it is.

So now, you may have great confidence in Ohm's Law.

Don't have any confidence in Ohm's Law.

The conductivity sigma is a strong function of the temperature.

If you increase the temperature, then the time tau between collisions goes down, because the speed of these free electrons goes up.

It's a very strong function of temperature.

And so if tau goes down, then clearly, what will happen is that the conductivity will go down.

And that means rho will go up.

And so you get more resistance.

And so when you heat up a substance, the resistance goes up.

A higher temperature, higher resistance.

So the moment that the resistance R becomes a function of the temperature, I call that a total breakdown of V equals I R, a total breakdown of Ohm's Law.

If you look in your book, they say, "Oh, no, no, no, that's not a breakdown.

You just have to adjust the re- the resistance for a different temperature." Well, yes, that's an incredible poor man's way of saving a law that is a very bad law.

Because the temperature itself is a function of current, the higher the current the higher the temperature.

And so now, you get a ratio, V divided by I, which is no longer constant.

It becomes a function of the current.

That's the end of Ohm's Law.

And so I want to show you that if I do the same experiment that I did here, but if I replace this by a light bulb of 50 ohms -- it's a very small light bulb, resistance when it is hot is 50 ohms, when it is cold, it is 7 ohms.

So R cold of the light bulb is roughly 7 ohms, I believe, but I know that when it is hot, it's very close to the 50 ohms.

Think it's a little lower.

What do you expect now?

Well, you expect now, that when the resistance is low in the beginning, you get this, and then when the resistance goes up, you're going to get this.

I may end up a little higher current, because I think the resistance is a little lower than 50 ohms.

And if you see a curve like this, that's not linear anymore.

So that's the end of Ohm's Law.

And that's what I want to show you now.

So, all I do is, here I have this little light bulb -- for those of you who sit close, they can actually see that light bulb start glowing, but that's not important, I really want you to see that V versus I is no longer linear, there you go.

And you see, every time you see this light bulb go on, it heats up, and during the heating up, it, um, the resistance increases.

And it's the end of Ohm's Law, for this light bulb, at least.

It was fine for the other resistor, but it was not fine for this light bulb.

There is another way that I can show you that Ohm's Law is not always doing so well.

I have a 125 volt power supply, so V is 125 volts -- this is the potential difference -- and I have a light bulb, you see it here, that's the light bulb -- the resistance of the light bulb, cold, I believe, is 25 ohms, and hot, is about 250 ohms.

A huge difference.

So if the resistance -- if I take the cold resistance, then I would get 5 amperes, but by the time that the bulb is hot, I would only get half an ampere.

It's a huge difference.

And what I want to show you, again with the oscilloscope, is the current as a function of time.

When you switch on a light bulb, you would expect, if Ohm's Law holds, that when you switch on the current -- or switch on the voltage, I should say -- that you see this.

This is then your 5 amperes.

And that it would stay there.

That's the whole idea.

Namely, that the voltage divided by the current remains a constant.

However, what you're going to see is like this.

Current goes up, but then the resistance goes down, then the resistance goes up, when the current goes up, the resistance goes up, and then therefore the current will go down, and will level off at a level which is substantially below this.

So you're looking there -- you're staring at the breakdown of Ohm's Law.

And so that's what I want to show you now.

So, here we need 125 volts -- and there is the light bulb, and when I throw this switch, you will see the pattern of the current versus time -- you will only see it once, and then we freeze it with the oscilloscope -- turn this off -- so look closely, now.

There it is.

Forget these little ripples that you see on it, it has to do with the way that we produce the 125 volts.

And so you see here, horizontally, time, the time between two adjacent vertical lines is 20 milliseconds.

And so, indeed, very early on, the current surged toward -- to a very high value, and then the filament heats up, and so the resistance goes up, the light bulb, and the current just goes back again.

From the far left to the far right on the screen is about 200 milliseconds.

That's about 2/10 of a second.

And here you get a current level which is way lower than what you get there.

That's a breakdown of Ohm's Law.

It is actually very nice that resistances go up with light bulbs when the temperature goes up.

Because, suppose it were the other way around.

Suppose you turn on a light bulb, and the resistance would go down.

Light bulb got hot, resistance goes down, that means the current goes up.

Instead of down, the current goes up.

That means it gets hotter.

That means the resistance goes even further down.

That means the current goes even further up.

And so what it would mean is that every time you turn on a light bulb, it would, right in front of your eyes, destruct itself.

That's not happening.

It's the other way around.

So, in a way, it's fortunate that the resistance goes up when the light bulbs get hot.

All right.

Pengembangan Perkuliahan

1. Buatlah sebuah Esai mengenai materi perkuliahan ini

2. Buatlah sebuah kelompok berjumlah 5 orang untuk menganalisis materi perkuliahan ini

3. Lakukan Penelitian Sederhana dengan kelompok tersebut

4. Hasilkan sebuah produk yang dapat digunakan oleh masyarakat

5. Kembangkan produk tersebut dengan senantiasa meningkatkan kualitasnya#### Staff

Visualizations:

Prof. John Belcher

Instructors:

Dr. Peter Dourmashkin

Prof. Bruce Knuteson

Prof. Gunther Roland

Prof. Bolek Wyslouch

Dr. Brian Wecht

Prof. Eric Katsavounidis

Prof. Robert Simcoe

Prof. Joseph Formaggio

Course Co-Administrators:

Dr. Peter Dourmashkin

Prof. Robert Redwine

Technical Instructors:

Andy Neely

Matthew Strafuss

Course Material:

Dr. Peter Dourmashkin

Prof. Eric Hudson

Dr. Sen-Ben Liao

#### Acknowledgements

The TEAL project is supported by The Alex and Brit d'Arbeloff Fund for Excellence in MIT Education, MIT iCampus, the Davis Educational Foundation, the National Science Foundation, the Class of 1960 Endowment for Innovation in Education, the Class of 1951 Fund for Excellence in Education, the Class of 1955 Fund for Excellence in Teaching, and the Helena Foundation. Many people have contributed to the development of the course materials. (PDF)

Terima Kasih Semoga Bermanfaat dan mohon Maaf apabila ada kesalahan.

## Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar